Why the Cheng Brothers and Zhu Xi Attached Paramount Importance to the “Gateway to the Virtue Realm of Sagehood” in the Sequential Process of Moral Self-Cultivation?

——An Exploration of the Core Reasons for the Cheng Brothers and Zhu Xi Attached Great Emphasis on “The Gateway to Virtue Realm of Sagehood”

1. Theoretical Dimension: The Metaphysical Reconstruction of Confucian Moral Orthodoxy

The profound theoretical motivation behind the Cheng Brothers and Zhu Xi’s advocacy of “The Gateway to Virtue Realm of Sagehood” lies in its capacity to remedy the structural deficiencies of traditional Confucianism and refute heterodox ideological systems. Prior to the prosperity of Neo-Confucianism, traditional Confucian discourse prioritized empirical ethical norms and political governance theories while lacking systematic metaphysical elaborations concerning the ontological origin, rational possibility, and transcendental destination of moral cultivation. In contrast, Buddhism and Taoism had developed sophisticated ideological systems regarding cosmic ontology and spiritual transcendence of the mind-nature, dominating China’s intellectual and spiritual domains since the Wei and Jin dynasties and continuously undermining the orthodox status of Confucianism. Accordingly, the proposition of “The Gateway to Virtue Realm of Sagehood” emerged as a pivotal theoretical breakthrough through which Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucianism reconstructed the discursive authority of Confucianism.

1.1 Completing the Logical System of Moral Ontology

The Cheng Brothers defined the Heavenly Principle as the ultimate ontological foundation governing the universe, social operations, and human ethical norms. Zhu Xi further consolidated the core proposition that “human nature is identical to the Principle”, establishing a coherent Neo-Confucian system integrating ontology, mind-nature theory, and moral practice. As the core carrier of this systematic philosophy, “The Gateway to Virtue Realm of Sagehood”, structured by the three fundamental principles and eight practical articles of The Great Learning, resolves the critical theoretical dilemma of how the transcendent Heavenly Principle can be embodied and implemented in individual daily moral conduct.

From the Cheng-Zhu philosophical perspective, the innate luminous virtue endowed by Heaven is immanent within the human mind as the universal Heavenly Principle. Nevertheless, ordinary human beings are often constrained by innate material temperament and obscured by selfish desires, resulting in a rupture between mundane existence and the transcendent moral ontology. The progressive doctrinal system of “The Gateway to Virtue Realm of Sagehood” provides a rational and logical path for the restoration of original human nature. Through the investigation of things and the extension of knowledge, individuals exhaust the inherent principles of all entities and acquire rigorous moral cognition. The subsequent cultivation of sincere will and rectified mind enables internal spiritual purification and the elimination of selfish biases and temperamental limitations. Ultimately, the practices of self-cultivation, family regulation, state governance, and world pacification facilitate the full manifestation and social extension of innate luminous virtue.

This theoretical framework integrates the transcendent Heavenly Principle, individual moral subjectivity, and social ethical order into a logically rigorous and self-consistent system. It compensates for the traditional Confucian separation between metaphysical transcendence and empirical practice, endowing Confucian morality with both practical operability and transcendental depth, and thereby consolidating the metaphysical foundation of Confucian sagehood theory.

1.2 Demarcating Theoretical Boundaries Between Confucianism and Heterodox Doctrines

The fundamental intellectual divergence between Neo-Confucianism and heterodox Buddhism and Taoism resides in their distinct modes of transcendence. Buddhism pursues the transcendence of emptiness by abandoning mundane ethical relations, while Taoism advocates solitary spiritual refinement detached from social governance and worldly duties. Both traditions separate inner spiritual cultivation from outer social practice, culminating in abstract and impractical transcendental doctrines.

Zhu Xi critically condemned the prevalent academic malpractice of prioritizing empty speculation over practical engagement in his era. He insisted that authentic Confucian sage learning is inherently rooted in daily human relations and tangible worldly affairs. The core essence of “The Gateway to Virtue Realm of Sagehood” lies in “attaining transcendence through mundane practice”, which stipulates that all moral cultivation and sagehood aspirations must be grounded in the investigation of mundane principles and everyday ethical conduct. No detached, abstract Dao exists beyond worldly practical experience.

The Cheng-Zhu maxim that “moral cultivation relies on reverence, while intellectual advancement resides in the extension of knowledge” further defines the exclusive orthodox path of Confucian transcendence. Inner cultivation through reverence safeguards the purity of the moral subject, while the investigation of things and extension of knowledge guarantee the authenticity of moral practice. The mutual reinforcement of these two dimensions constructs a uniquely Confucian system of immanent transcendence, which fundamentally demarcates Confucian sage learning from the reclusive, empty cultivation of Buddhism and Taoism and firmly reinforces the theoretical orthodoxy of Confucianism.

2. Practical Dimension: Standardizing the Progressive Order of Sagehood Cultivation

While the theoretical value of “The Gateway to Virtue Realm of Sagehood” consists in reshaping the metaphysical orthodoxy of Confucianism, its practical significance lies in rectifying the historical disorder and aimlessness of traditional moral cultivation. It establishes a standardized, sequential, and implementable lifelong cultivation system oriented toward sagehood. Before the formulation of this proposition, traditional scholarly practice suffered from severe fragmentation of learning, reflection, and action. Many scholars either indulged in rigid textual exegesis while neglecting moral cultivation or pursued empty mystical enlightenment without engaging in gradual practical spiritual discipline.

2.1 Establishing the Fundamental Starting Point of Moral Practice

The Cheng Brothers explicitly regarded The Great Learning as “the beginner’s gateway to virtue”, primarily because it preserves a complete and structured system of sage cultivation that is absent in The Analects and Mencius. Zhu Xi further formalized the immutable foundational principle of all moral praxis: “reverence for inner cultivation and knowledge extension for academic progress”. Analogous to the dual wheels of a cart or the paired wings of a bird, these two approaches are interdependent, mutually facilitative, and indispensable to holistic moral development.

In practical cultivation, the investigation of things and extension of knowledge constitute the cognitive foundation of moral initiation. Only through exhaustive inquiry into the principles inherent in daily affairs can individuals transcend the obscuration of material temperament and selfish desires, acquire authentic moral cognition, and avoid the ignorance of blind and unprincipled scholarly pursuit. Reverent spiritual cultivation serves as the psychological safeguard for moral advancement, concentrating the mind on the Heavenly Principle, restraining selfish inclinations, and transforming external intellectual understanding of moral principles into internalized sincere moral intention, rather than superficial textual knowledge.

2.2 Standardizing the Progressive Order of Inner Sageliness and Outer Kingship

The core practical function of “The Gateway to Virtue Realm of Sagehood” is to systematize scattered moral norms into an irreversible, progressive cultivation framework centered on self-cultivation and extending from internal spiritual refinement to external social practice. The initial four stages—investigation of things, extension of knowledge, sincerity of the will, and rectification of the mind—constitute the inner sageliness discipline, enabling the purification and perfection of individual moral subjectivity. The subsequent four stages—self-cultivation, family regulation, state governance, and world pacification—represent the outer kingship praxis, expanding individual internal virtue into social ethical order and universal governance.

This sequential system resolves two pivotal practical dilemmas inherent in traditional moral cultivation. It corrects the fallacy of pursuing abstract sagehood while neglecting mundane practical inquiry, and remedies the superficiality of emphasizing external behavioral rituals without nurturing internal mind-nature virtue. In doing so, it fully realizes the core Confucian educational tenet that moral cultivation is fundamental while scholarly learning is auxiliary.

2.3 Rectifying Academic Malpractices and Guiding Lifelong Learning

Zhu Xi incisively diagnosed the scholarly flaws of his contemporary intellectual community: most scholars either succumbed to the empty and lofty speculation characteristic of Buddhist and Taoist thought or rigidly adhered to superficial formal rituals, abandoning the moderate, practical, and self-engaged essence of Confucian moral cultivation. The proposition of “The Gateway to Virtue Realm of Sagehood” was specifically formulated to rectify these prevalent malpractices, providing scholars with a moderate, steady, progressive, and lifelong feasible path of learning and moral advancement.

Distinct from the sudden enlightenment paradigm advocated by Buddhism and Taoism, the Cheng-Zhu “Gateway to Virtue” emphasizes gradual accumulation and daily moral renewal. It anchors sagehood cultivation within the mundane practices of familial ethics, interpersonal communication, and socio-political governance. Ordinary individuals can eliminate selfish desires, transform their innate temperament through sustained progressive discipline, and ultimately attain the supreme moral realm of ultimate goodness. This framework establishes a standardized and implementable practical paradigm for lifelong Confucian moral education.

The Cheng Brothers and Zhu Xi’s vigorous advocacy of “The Gateway to Virtue Realm of Sagehood” stems from its irreplaceable value in the theoretical reconstruction and practical rectification of Neo-Confucianism. Theoretically, it completes the metaphysical closed loop of the Confucian moral system, clearly distinguishes the transcendental paradigms of Confucianism from Buddhism and Taoism, and consolidates the orthodox foundation of Confucian sagehood learning. Practically, centered on the Eight Articles of The Great Learning, it constructs an integrated progressive cultivation system of inner sageliness and outer kingship, resolves the millennia-old disconnection between learning and practice in traditional Confucianism, standardizes the sequential order of scholars’ lifelong moral praxis, and unifies the lofty ideal of sagehood with mundane progressive cultivation.

As the foundational entry and core thread of moral cultivation in Cheng-Zhu Neo-Confucianism, “The Gateway to Virtue Realm of Sagehood” traverses the entire process of investigating things, extending knowledge, rectifying the mind, cultivating the self, regulating the family, governing the state, and pacifying the world. It translates the abstract Confucian ideal of sagehood into operable, progressive, and accumulative daily moral practice. This theoretical framework not only establishes the fundamental paradigm of moral philosophy in Song-Ming Neo-Confucianism but also shapes the spiritual disposition of traditional Chinese intellectuals in pursuing virtue and scholarly advancement, embodying profound theoretical implications and enduring practical value.

References

Chen, L. (2000). Research on Master Zhu’s Philosophy. East China Normal University Press.

Chen, L. (2004). Song-Ming Neo-Confucianism. East China Normal University Press.

Cheng, H., & Cheng, Y. (2000). Surviving Writings of the Two Cheng Brothers. Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.

Feng, B. (2024). Textual research and significance of Zhu Xi’s study on Zengzi’s works. National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences, 5, 22.

Guo, X. D. (2020). From primary school completion to university initiation: The significance of Zhu Xi’s primary school theory for understanding his Great Learning praxis. Fudan University Journal, 4, 45–53.

Hong, M. C. (2025). Entry and virtue: A study on the primary meaning of Zhu Xi’s gongwu and jingyang praxis. Ethics and Civilization, 5, 42–51.

Li, Y. (2026). Establishment through “abiding”: A new exploration of the ideological structure of The Great Learning. Toutiao Academic Journal, 6, 15–21.

Long, Y. L. (2024). Order: The discourse structure of the way of The Great Learning. Philosophical Research, 9, 34–43.

Long, Y. L. (2025). Aspiring to the Dao: The holistic structure of The Great Learning’s investigation and enlightenment. Philosophical Research, 3, 56–64.

Qian, M. (2011). New Studies on Master Zhu. Jiuzhou Press.

Sun, J. (2025). Transformation and Renewal: The Theoretical Logic and Practical Path of The Great Learning Entering Educational Life. People’s Education Press.

Tuo, T., et al. (1977). History of the Song Dynasty. Zhonghua Book Company.

Xu, H. Z. (2024). The Gateway to Virtue Realm of Sagehood and the way of inner sageliness and outer kingship for contemporary college students. Student Affairs Office of Fuzhou University.

People’s Daily. (2025, July 15). The Great Learning: Confucian “beginner’s gateway to virtue”. China Ethnic Network.

Zhu, X. (1986). Classified Conversations of Master Zhu. Zhonghua Book Company.

Zhu, X. (2011). Collected Commentaries on the Four Books. Zhonghua Book Company.